Move South Station?

Jay Tsai and Miron Nawratil, two students at the Yale School of Architecture, proposed a not-so-far-fetched alternative to the current plans for alleviating the shortage of track space at Boston’s South Station. MassDOT’s current plan is to re-locate the existing post office facility to provide space for additional tracks, opening up options for expanding commuter rail service to underserved communities. In Tsai and Nawratil’s proposal, the Fort Point Channel is dammed and drained south of Summer Street (think The Netherlands) to create more than enough sub-surface space for the ideal future track capacity of the station. The benefit is a fully subterranean train station, allowing for the redevelopment of both the existing and new track areas for urban development that can knit the Leather District directly to the loft buildings in the Fort Point District.

Just as importantly, the new South Station headhouse will provide views north across Fort Point Channel and Boston Harbor to visitors first arriving in Boston. Only the train station in Venice provides a comparatively dramatic view. Commuters and visitors would find water taxis and ferries directly across Summer Street. Importantly, the new tracks and station could be built while the existing station is fully operational. With only a flip of a switch, trains could be directed into the new station, freeing up the old facility for demolition – except for the historic headhouse, which would be saved as part of a redevelopment plan.  

The project, done for a post-professional studio co-taught by Ed Mitchell, Fred Koetter, and Aniket Shahane, is just another thought-provoking urban proposal done in the urban design-focused architecture studios conceived and taught by Mitchell and his colleagues. More on Mitchell’s other recent studios – focused on New Bedford, Taunton, Providence, and Brooklyn – later.

-Tim

Rendering_aerial_02Rendering_aerial_01Rendering_interior_02

4 thoughts on “Move South Station?

  1. Interesting idea, but you’d have to get buy-in from Procter and Gamble, because Gillette World Shaving Headquarters draws a ton of water from the channel (not sure if they use it for something other than manufacturing, but there are warning signs for boaters in the channel to stay well clear of the intake). Then there’s the part of the Ted Williams Tunnel approach that goes right under that part of the channel.

  2. In fact, the Big Dig had to go to significant expense building a tunnel under the channel, because Gillette refused to permit them to fill it in. And, the Red Line runs under the channel for most of its length, and the I-90 tunnel crosses over it, so I don’t know how subterranean the station would be able to be.

  3. Interesting idea. I wonder if this approach would also accommodate the North-South Rail Link, which would allow commuter rail and Amtrak trains to continue through Boston rather than having to terminate at North and South Stations, which would have enormous operational and service benefits.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s